
Crisis Longevity in the Digital Age
What if the very forces that magnify a crisis in the public eye—namely round-the-clock news and social media—also hasten its disappearance from collective memory? In this paper, we weave together real-time market data, in-depth media analysis, and established crisis communication frameworks to reveal how rapid, high-stakes corporate scandals can flare up and then fade more quickly than ever before. Yet beneath the surface, reputational damage still lingers, placing a premium on strategic, transparent communication. By examining case studies across industries and crisis types, we uncover why today’s information overload might shorten a crisis’s most dramatic phase even as it requires organizations to work harder and longer to rebuild trust.

Best Practice & Key Takeaways: Crisis Longevity in the Digital Age
Best Practice & Key Takeaways from the combined quantitative and qualitative analyses of corporate crises examined in the paper “Crisis Longevity in the Digital Age”.

From Condolences to Accountability
How Should Companies Respond When Systemic Failures Lead to Public Outrage? A major healthcare corporation recently found itself at the center of a shocking and tragic event—one that has ignited widespread debate about corporate responsibility, patient care, and systemic failures. What began as a crisis of operational inefficiencies has now escalated into a highly politicized public reckoning, putting immense pressure on leadership to respond appropriately. The company’s initial response followed the expected playbook. However, as public scrutiny intensified, it became clear that a mere expression of sympathy would not suffice. The company had to move beyond “thoughts and prayers” to meaningful accountability measures—without inadvertently legitimizing extreme actions taken in response to their failures.

When Internal Memos Go Public
In today’s hyperconnected world, internal memos, confidential reports, and executive emails can quickly become front-page news. Whether it’s layoff details leaked before official announcements, sensitive financial data reaching competitors, or executive remarks sparking controversy, corporate leaks can severely damage trust and internal stability.

Damage Control in Brussels
The European Commission plays a central role in EU governance, acting as both the executive body and a regulatory authority. Its legitimacy is built on trust, transparency, and adherence to ethical norms. However, political scandals can severely damage this legitimacy, triggering crises that require strategic communication and reputation management. This paper examines the EC's crisis communication strategy through two high-profile scandals: the Dalli Cash-for-Influence Scandal (2012) and the Barroso Revolving Doors Scandal (2016). Using five key crisis management indicators—speed, openness, rule application, tone, and reform engagement—this analysis assesses the effectiveness of the EC’s response and extracts key lessons for political crisis management.